logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.03.22 2017고단81
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 20,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 16, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving of alcohol) passes through a mountain village park located in the same Dong in front of the Hancheon-gu apartment building located in the Southern-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-do on the ground of the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving of alcohol)

From the section of approximately 3.2 km up to the New U.S. E in the Gu Shin-dong, he/she driven a motor vehicle of 10% of alcohol concentration in blood while under the influence of alcohol.

2. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving service of a motor vehicle with a self-durged motor vehicle as set forth in paragraph 1.

On November 16, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at around 22:10, and turned it to the Cheongju-gun's Cheong-gun's Cheong-gun's Cheong-gun's Cheong-gun's Cheong-gun's Cheong-gun's Cheong-gun's Cheong-dong, Ulsan-gu.

At this point, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to reduce the speed and to prevent the shock with the parked vehicle by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brake system in the front of the large park, since the driver of the vehicle was in the stop of the G K3 passenger vehicle that is driven by the victim F (F, 58 years old) in front of the large park.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, like Paragraph 1, failed to accurately operate the steering direction and brakes while under the influence of alcohol, was negligent in the course of duty, and the victim who was parked in the front of the Grand Park, left the G K3 car driven in the front of the Grand Park, and the part of the damaged vehicle was shocked to the front of the said Aburged vehicle, thereby damaging the damaged vehicle so that the amount equivalent to KRW 200,000 of the repair cost would be 20,000 and escaped immediately without taking necessary measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Fact-finding reports on drivers of drinking alcohol and inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking alcohol;

1. Application of written estimates (G) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 148 of the Act and Articles 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act (the occupation of a measure after an accident) concerning facts constituting an offense, as well as Article 148-2(2)2 of the Road Traffic Act.

arrow