beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 40,498,776; and (b) KRW 5,00,000 to Plaintiff B; and (c) each of them, from June 29, 2011 to December 2014.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On June 29, 201, the Plaintiff A driven the Mad Driving E (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) in the direction of the Southern-do Office, Namwon-gun, Namwon-gun, Seoul (hereinafter “the instant Madba”), and proceeded into the intersection (hereinafter “Y’-type intersection”) from the direction of the Mad Driving City to the direction of the Mad Driving City (hereinafter “the instant Mad-type intersection”) in the direction of the Mad Driving City, the direction of the Mad Driving Office, in the direction of the Mad Driving City (hereinafter “instant vehicle”).
The right side of the Otoba in this case conflicts between the part of the driver's seat of the motor vehicle in this case and the part of the back part of the motor vehicle in this case. Accordingly, the plaintiff A suffered bodily injury, such as cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral eption.
(hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident.” On the other hand, there was a stop line on the surface immediately before the intersection of each road on which the instant motor vehicle and the Otoba have run (However, the stop line on the road driving in the instant motor vehicle is more than about 15 meters prior to the stop line on the road driving on the Otoba), and there was a concession sign on the right side of the stop line on the road driving in the instant motor vehicle.
B. Plaintiff F is the denial of Plaintiff A, and at the time of the instant accident, Plaintiff F was the insurer that entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with D with respect to the instant automobile. (2) At the time of the instant accident, the Defendant was an insurance company that entered into the instant automobile with D.
[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's 1 through 5, Eul's 1 through 5 (including paper numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. According to the above facts of recognition of the liability, since the accident of this case occurred due to negligence of driving without concession or suspension by D even though the concession sign and the stop line on the road on the road of this case occurred, the defendant, the insurer of this case, is the insurer of this case, shall occur to the plaintiffs.