logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.03.10 2017고단563
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and fines for ten million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine for three million won.

The defendants are the defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a business owner operating commercial sex acts in the trade name of “F” by leasing heading 719, 724, Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Etel.

On September 30, 2016, from around January 12, 2017 to around January 12, 2017, the Defendant advertised the above business establishment on the Internet site, such as “G,” etc., and reported it to the above business establishment, and had female employees, such as H and I, employed in advance, engage in a similar teaching act that stimulates the sexual organ of the male sex purchase with his/her hand and entry, thereby arranging sexual traffic.

2. Defendant B

A. On October 27, 2016 and November 20, 2016, 23, and 30 on the 30th of the same month, the Defendant, at the “J” convenience store operated by the Defendant, located in the same building as the above sexual traffic business establishment, “a request to receive a promise by telephone from the male sex purchase”, “a request to receive a promise from the male sex purchase” was made by communicating with the male sex purchase with the mobile phone at the request of the above A, thereby preventing the Defendant from doing so by facilitating the act of arranging sexual traffic as described in paragraph 1 of the above A.

B. On November 2016, the Defendant received a request from the said A to “if the said sexual traffic business establishment is controlled, a request shall be received as an owner of the business instead of receiving an investigation. It shall be paid in lieu of a fine.” On January 12, 2017, when the said business establishment was controlled by the police, the Defendant was in contact with the said A and was found to the said officetel 724, and the Defendant made a false statement to the police officer as the owner of the said business establishment, thereby facilitating the act of arranging sexual traffic as described in paragraph (1) of the said A, thereby protecting the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning suspect interrogation of the defendant A by the prosecution;

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants, H and I

1. A criminal investigation report (Attachment of the conversation with the suspect B) and the K dialogic photo attached thereto;

1. Place of business;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow