Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

From around 1998, the Defendant treated patients from around 199 to many people using protein and tinate, etc., or prescribed and sold them.

A person who intends to sell functional health foods shall report to the competent authority on April 26, 2016. However, the Defendant: (a) stated in D in P in P in P in P in P in P in P in P in P in P in P in order to the effect that he/she is "specific efficacy in cancer" to E; and (b) sold 700,000 won and physical quality improvement chemicals made of tin dust, such as marin, Dotour, mushroom, red clus, white clus, white clus, and clutins, etc.; and (c) around April 28, 2016, the Defendant did not report to the competent authority that he/she would have side effects after eating alcohol; and (d) received 00,000 won from E in P in order to sell them.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Partial statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant by the prosecution;

1. Some statements made against the defendant during the police interrogation protocol;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. A public inspection document (a copy of the forwarding document of the case at the police station in the Chungcheongbuk-gu, the Republic of Korea, and one copy of the public inspection document (a copy of the forwarding document at the police station in the Sejong High-gu, Taewon-won), an investigation report (a copy of the confirmation of the same type

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Response to a request for appraisal;

1. Copy of the judgment;

1. A certificate of the contents, a letter, and a reply;

1. Each photograph description (the defendant and his defense counsel) asserts that they are not sold to E, only after the request of E to see their appearance promotion agents, physical quality improvement agents, and propolates as indicated in the judgment of E.

However, E made a specific statement in its reasoning at an investigative agency (after that, E was deceased and could not hear its statement in the court).