logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.09.25 2019나19107
추심금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal and the additional selective claims filed by this court are all dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Party 1) The Defendant is the Door-to-Door Sales Act (hereinafter “Door Sales Act”).

A) Under Article 4(1) and Article 4(1) of the Act on Door-to-Door Sales and Door-to-Door Sales Act refer to extraordinary sales, which include door-to-door sales, telephone sales, multi-level marketing, door-to-door sales under sponsorship, continuous transaction, and transactions for soliciting business. 2) A Co., Ltd. (C; hereinafter referred to as “non-party company”) concluded a mutual aid agreement with the Defendant on January 25, 2016 to engage in multi-level marketing business, and paid contributions, and agreed to enter into the instant mutual aid agreement with the Defendant on October 30, 2018, and withdrawn from the Defendant on December 8, 2015.

B. The content of the instant mutual aid agreement and the Defendant’s establishment of a pledge 1) The main contents of the guidelines for the processing of (a) the Defendant’s mutual aid agreement, mutual aid provision, and (b) seizure of money invested, etc. are as follows. In the case of entering into a mutual aid agreement with B mutual aid association (hereinafter “association”), the mutual aid contractor (hereinafter “contractor”) shall approve that the provisions of the association, including the guidelines on the business of mutual aid transaction with the union (hereinafter “mutual aid agreement”) shall apply to the business of mutual aid transaction with B mutual aid association, and shall agree to the following provisions:

Provided, That the term of the mutual aid transaction agreement under the renewed contract shall be immediately preceding.

arrow