logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.01.13 2015고단1080
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 14:40 on April 2, 2015, the Defendant assaulted the face of the Defendant on his hand while taking a bath to the Defendant, even though he received the demand from the Seoul Dobong Police Station D police box, who was dispatched to the site after receiving a report from 112, to “the person who is on board a taxi without a taxi” from the police station of Dobong-gu Seoul, Seoul, which was called to the site.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the 112 criminal reporting processing duty.

On June 2, 2015, 2015, the Defendant: (a) stopped on the victim FF (28 years of age) in front of the exit of the 1197-ray 1197-ray 2, a country of the Government-Si of the Gyeonggi-si in 00:30 on June 2, 2015; (b) had an electronic tobacco pipe in possession of a dispute with the victim one time for the victim’s head; and (c) had a face part of the victim’s face, hand hand, and part of the victim’s hand, with the face part of the number of days of treatment and the part of the left hand hand of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

"2015 Highest 1080"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Records of police statements to E "2015 Senior 2519 Senior 2519";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police interrogation protocol concerning F;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (Interference with the performance of official duties), Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act is due to the increase of multiple crimes in the case of crimes 1 (Interference with the performance of official duties) (the scope of recommendations) in the basic area (from June to January 1) (the scope of recommendations from violence) (the scope of recommendations from June to April) (the scope of general injury) in the mitigation area (from February to one year), the mitigation area (including February to 1), the mitigation area (including special mitigation persons), the punishment exemption (including serious efforts for recovery of damage), or the recovery of considerable damage).

arrow