logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2015.03.25 2014나2051
임대료
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "The defendant deleted "the main energy" of Part 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance as "the defendant", "the 5th page 16 of the judgment of the court of first instance," and "the 4th page 17 to 18", and "the 150 won/km" of the special contract of transfer and acquisition of this case are stated as "the 150 won/km". The 150 won/km of the professional gas of this case are interpreted as the 150 won/km of each contract of transfer and acquisition of this case. The transfer and acquisition contract of this case was signed directly by D, who is an employee of the plaintiff, and signed by D, and it is hard to accept the supply price of this case from the plaintiff's standpoint that the supply price of this case should be stated in the contract of transfer and acquisition of this case as the 4th page of the judgment of the court of first instance, and there is no special circumstance to interpret that the supply price has been omitted.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow