Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 3,000,000 and by a fine of KRW 2,500,000, respectively.

The Defendants respectively.

Punishment of the crime

Victim C (the remaining, 29 years old) and Victim D (the remaining, 29 years old) were pedagogy with actors while drinking alcohol and drinking in a way that they had a way for their friendship, and the Defendants and E excessive trial costs had led to a dispute.

피해자 C은 2018. 1. 21 03:55 경 수원시 팔달구 F 앞 도로에서 주먹으로 피고인 B의 얼굴을 수회 때렸고, E의 멱살을 잡고 주먹으로 얼굴을 때리려는 시늉을 하였으며, 피해자 D은 주먹으로 피고인 B의 얼굴을 수회 때렸다.

As the Defendants were assaulted as above at the above date, at the above time and place, Defendant B sold the victim’s face by drinking more than once, and Defendant A sold the victim’s face by drinking once. Defendant A sold the victim’s face by drinking more than once, and Defendant A sold the victim’s face and the body body face by drinking and drinking.

As a result, the Defendants jointly conducted an examination of the right face face part where the number of days of treatment cannot be known to the victim D, and the victim C placed an eye of the eyebrow in which the number of days of treatment cannot be known to the victim C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against D or C;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Photographss, etc. of the upper part of the victims;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes (A) to those who have suffered CCTV images (a gaser and yellow sprinkers are Defendant A and a white sprinker is Defendant B C);

1. The Defendants: Article 2 (2) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the choice of a punishment) concerning criminal facts;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Defendant B, on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, relatively minor in the degree of assault compared to Defendant A, and the victim’s assault was immediately against the victim’s assault and assault once (On the other hand, Defendant A continues to have been used.