A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 26, 2017, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol 0.146% during blood transfusion, driven a motor vehicle in B SP-type under the influence of alcohol 0.23:57, and proceeded with a section of about 3 km from the front side of the Gmpon Hospital located in the Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Bupyeong-gu to the front side of the 1st class of the Seo-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City, which is located in the same funeral.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to notify the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44-2 (Selection of Imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following extenuating circumstances in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Protection, Observation, etc. of the Order to Attend the School, and Article 62-2(1) of the Road Traffic Act, even though there were three times of criminal records and several times of violation of the Road Traffic Act, and the crime of this case where the defendant drives a vehicle under the influence of alcohol. However, the defendant is sentenced to the above punishment by taking into account the following circumstances, such as the fact that he was found to have been driving a motor vehicle after drinking a baby after drinking a baby after drinking a baby, he seems to have been under the influence of a person who was under the influence of him before a day, and the fact that he was in violation of other traffic-related Acts and subordinate statutes, that he did not go against the other traffic-related Acts and subordinate statutes, that he did not repeat the crime, such as selling the vehicle in possession, etc., and that the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relationship, etc.