1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) Of the buildings listed in the separate sheet, each point of the separate sheet No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 1.

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the whole purport of the pleadings in Gap evidence No. 1, Gap evidence No. 2, Gap evidence No. 3, Gap evidence No. 4, and Eul evidence No. 6, and there is no counter-proof.

On September 30, 2010, the Defendant entered into a lease agreement with Nonparty C on the lease of KRW 5,000,000 per annum on the part (A) of the ship (hereinafter “the leased object of this case”) which connects each point of Nonparty C and Annex C, among the buildings listed in the separate sheet, each point of which is indicated in the separate sheet No. 1,2,3,4,5,6,6,7,7,8, and 1, and 49.6 square meters per annum.

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). B.

On September 24, 2014, the Plaintiff received the registration of ownership transfer from Nonparty C for a building listed in the separate sheet, and succeeded to the lessor’s status under the instant lease agreement.

C. On August 19, 2015, the Plaintiff sent to the Defendant a content-certified mail that the instant lease agreement would not be renewed any longer.

Attached Form

The list is the first floor of the first-class neighborhood living facilities, and the toilets have already been installed inside the building. The defendant installed the walls of the assembly type board, concrete floor body, boiler machinery and equipment, stoves and stoves, stoves and stoves, stoves, and stoves within the leased object of this case, such as the list of the attached facilities. The defendant operated the real estate brokerage business.

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's claim

A. (1) The Plaintiff’s assertion (1) The instant lease agreement on the delivery of the leased object and the removal of the facilities of this case does not exceed the required period of the right to renew the contract under the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act after the lapse of five years, and thus is no longer renewed. Thus, the period expires. The Defendant is obligated to deliver the leased object to the Plaintiff as a duty to restore it to the Plaintiff, and remove the facilities listed in the attached Table (hereinafter “instant facilities”).

(ii)a fee; and