1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On November 28, 1978, the Plaintiff entered the Army and served at a military police unit of the 27th Army, etc. from August 2, 1986 to July 26, 200. After serving at a military police unit of the 31st Army, etc., the Plaintiff discharged the Plaintiff from active service on January 31, 2012.

B. On February 27, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) was the Defendant on February 27, 201; (b) was the Defendant, due to the performance of his duties or education and training during his military service, the payment for the left-hand slotist, and was doing so on September 22, 2011; (c) but (d) was the instant injury and disease below the left-hand slotist.

A soldier or policeman was recognized as a soldier or policeman on September 12, 2012 on the ground that his/her functional disorder remains. However, on October 30, 2012, the results of physical examination conducted at the Gwangju Veterans Hospital on October 30, 2012, which was determined below the criteria for disability rating, and was determined as non-conformity of the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State on November 5, 2012 from the Defendant.

(A) received [The fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entry of Gap evidence 1-1-2, Gap evidence 2-1-3, Eul evidence 1-2, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. On September 22, 2011, the Plaintiff’s summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion has an unstable nature of 15 meters on the left-hand slots even though he/she received re-statement as the left-hand slots.

Therefore, Article 8-3 [Attachment 4] 8-A of the Enforcement Rule of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State (hereinafter “Act”).

The disposition of this case on a different premise shall be revoked because it is unfair to say that the disposition of this case is unfair.

[The Act on the Persons of Distinguished Services to the State] Article 6-4 (Classification of Disability Ratings) (1) of the Act on the Persons of Distinguished Services to the State shall be classified into Grade I, Grade II, Grade III, Grade IV, Grade V, Grade V, Grade VI, and Grade VII according to the degree of disability.

In such cases, the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement shall deliberate and decide thereon.