All appeals are dismissed.

The judgment below

Part 14 of the 14th page "public prosecutor and the defendant" shall be "public prosecutor".

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court as to Defendant B’s grounds of appeal, the lower court was justifiable to have found Defendant B guilty of all of the charges of this case against each of the instant public official election law, on the grounds indicated in its reasoning. In so doing, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on election campaign

Meanwhile, Defendant B filed an appeal against the remainder of convictions in the judgment below, but there is no indication in the petition of appeal as to the grounds of appeal nor any statement in the grounds of appeal as to the grounds of appeal.

2. According to Article 383 subparag. 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act with respect to Defendant F’s grounds of appeal, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment with or without labor for more than ten years has been imposed. As such, in this case where Defendant F’s minor punishment was imposed, the argument that the amount of punishment is unreasonable is not legitimate grounds

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. Since there is an obvious clerical error in the reasoning of the judgment below, it is decided to correct it in accordance with Article 25 of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.