Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim C(the age of 65) are neighbors residing in the same village.

On September 12, 2014, around 07:30 on September 12, 2014, the Defendant got in front of the victim’s house located in the Jeonbuk-gun, Jeonbuk-gun, which read, “I am am har even if I am har if I am har,” and heard from the victim’s desire to read, “I am har, I am har, I am har. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h., the victim’s h. h. k’s g. h. h. h. k

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as “ves cageages, including two cages,” which require approximately four weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. A report on the occurrence of an injury, etc. and each investigation report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate (C) and the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The gist of the assertion is that the defendant was either at the time when he was the victim or she was dumped;

2. In full view of the following facts: (a) at the time of the instant case, the victim consistently stated at the police that the Defendant satisfe his own timber and franchisated in his hand; (b) he also made a statement unfavorable to himself; and (c) there is credibility of the victim’s above statement; and (d) the Defendant also recognized the victim’s shoulder part of the victim’s shoulder in order to injure the victim at the time of the instant case and the fact that the victim exceeded the victim at the time of the instant case, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as the facts of the instant case.