logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.09.06 2016고정3197
폭행
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 3, 2016, at around 00:0, the Defendant stated that “D” in front of the “D,” located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the victim E ( South and fifty years old) gave a warning to and dance for females, and that “Is the victim do not do so,” and that the victim abuseds the victim into the victim’s right-hand side of the bridge with his hand at one time and with his hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The witness E’s legal statement (as the contents of the statement are consistent and consistent in the main part, and the victim complained of the fact that he was assaulted at the time of the police dispatch, and the defendant also recognized the fact that he was harming the victim by generating and using his hand, credibility exists in light of the fact that the defendant was also aware of the victim

1. Protocol concerning the examination of the police of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal death in the case of violence;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant's act constitutes a legitimate defense or legitimate act, since the victim first puts the chest part of the defendant's chest, and that the defendant's act is merely a fluence of the victim's grandchildren.

However, according to the evidence of the court below, the defendant could at the time recognize the fact that the victim gets a majority of the victim's body due to the son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son'

Therefore, the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion is without merit.

[Judgment]

arrow