beta
Text
1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
Reasons
Basic Facts
From July 2014, the Defendant is a business entity running an accommodation business (hereinafter “instant pention”) with the trade name “Eision” (the trade name of around July 2015) “F pention” (hereinafter “instant pention”) in Yangyang-gun D, Gyeonggi-do.
(Evidence No. 1-2, No. 1-2, and No. 1-2). Plaintiff B, from October 1, 2015 to March 31, 2017, and Plaintiff A, from October 2, 2015 to June 7, 2016, were accommodated in the instant pen, while serving in and serving in the instant pen, and performed the said pen management work. The Defendant paid KRW 2,00,000 per month to the Plaintiffs from April 2016.
【In the absence of dispute, the Plaintiff’s assertion of the purport and purport of the entire pleadings, as well as the purport of the Plaintiff’s assertion by the parties concerned as to the facts that there was no dispute, Gap’s No. 1-2, Gap’s evidence No. 8, and Eul’s evidence No. 1-2, and Eul’s assertion by the parties concerned. Plaintiff B operated the instant pen with G and Dong business from April 2013 to August 2014, and liquidated a partnership with G around August 2014, and the Defendant accepted the penth from a foreign company around June 2014.
After September 2015, the defendant requested that the plaintiff B be entrusted with the operation of the pen.
Accordingly, from October 1, 2015, Plaintiff B started to work in the above pention together with Plaintiff A, E, E, and E, E, E, E, and I.
Since then, Plaintiff B demanded that the Defendant pay KRW 2,00,000 monthly salary to the Defendant during October 2015, but the Defendant unilaterally notified the Plaintiff that “the Plaintiff will be able to receive benefits from around April 2016,” and Plaintiff B did not pay KRW 11,935,483 of the wage from October 2, 2015 to April 31, 2016, respectively.
Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay each of the above unpaid wages and retirement allowances (hereinafter “instant wages, etc.”) and damages for delay to the plaintiffs.
The Defendant asserted that the Defendant had been operating as the partnership business from June 2014 to June 2014.