logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.11.16 2018누53124
공무상요양불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following matters:

2. The Public Official Pension Benefit Review Committee shall be appointed as the "Public Official Pension Benefit Review Committee" in 11.

2 pages 13 "Ap. 1 and 2" shall be understood as "Ap. 1 and 2 (including each number)."

3 Myeon 18's "this Court" shall be deemed to be "court of the first instance."

The 6th 6th 4th 6th king is as follows:

There is no other evidence to acknowledge it. In addition, the Plaintiff asserts to the effect that he was under the command of a superior from the military branch, and that he was under the direction of a superior from the military branch, and that he was under serious stress to the extent that he could not have been able to in the short term. However, each statement of evidence Nos. 13 and 14 (including each number) is insufficient to recognize it, and there is no other

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow