logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.06.25 2014나53769
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The part against Defendant F and G in the judgment of the first instance shall be revoked.

Defendant F and G are jointly and severally liable.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The first contractual relationship between the Plaintiffs and the Defendants is 1) Plaintiff A, on January 17, 201, refers to Defendant A’s diesel scenarios Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Bluios”).

2) As between Defendant BY and Defendant BY’s Educational Teaching Materials (“hereinafter “”) are the instant teaching materials.

(2) Around April 23, 2011, the Plaintiff entered into an agreement with Defendant B, Defendant B, and Defendant F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) on the following terms: (a) the Plaintiff entered into an agreement with the Plaintiff to set up and operate an exclusive branch within the designated area; and (b) the Plaintiff paid KRW 20 million as the price for the first goods on April 24, 201.

3) On January 27, 2011, Plaintiff C entered into an agreement with the Defendants Company as above, and paid KRW 9.3 million to the first price of the goods on February 9, 2011. Plaintiff D entered into an agreement with the Defendants Company on March 15, 2011, and paid KRW 20 million to the first price of the goods on March 16, 2011. Plaintiff E entered into an agreement with the Defendants Company on April 18, 201, and paid KRW 5 million with the first price of the goods on April 18, 2011, and paid KRW 10 million with the teaching materials on April 19, 201 as the first price of the goods, without obtaining the Plaintiffs’ initial authority to enter into the agreement with the Defendant on March 15, 201, but at the same time granting the Plaintiffs’ initial establishment of a branch office, including the Plaintiff’s initial right to promote the purchase of the goods on a deposit basis.

5) Defendant G is the copyright holder of the instant teaching material. B. The Plaintiffs, Defendant F and Defendant G, who entered into a new agreement between the Plaintiffs and Defendant G, and Defendant F and Defendant G, respectively, on September 11, 2012, are a new agreement in lieu of the initial agreement entered into as referred to in the foregoing paragraph (a) (hereinafter “instant agreement”).

(b) have entered into an agreement.

arrow