The crime committed by Defendant Nos. 1 through 4, and the crime committed by Defendant on June 10, 2015.

Punishment of the crime

[Dissenting Facts] On December 21, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Changwon District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Changwon Prison on December 25, 2012. On February 18, 2014, the Changwon District Court sentenced six months to imprisonment for fraud, etc. On June 18, 2014, the execution of the sentence was terminated at the Changwon Prison Prison. On April 9, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to three months in imprisonment with prison labor at the Changwon Branch Branch Branch, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on September 18, 2014 at the Changwon District Court, which became final and conclusive on April 30, 2015 at the Busan District Court’s Busan District Court, which became final and conclusive on June 26, 2015, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Busan District Court’s detention House, which became final and conclusive on June 26, 2015.

[2] On May 29, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 09:00 on May 29, 2015, 2015, the Defendant: (b) committed an act as if the Defendant would pay the price to the victim although he did not possess any means of payment; and (c) committed an act as if the Defendant would pay the price to the victim even if he did not have any intent or ability to pay the price; and (d) received the food and drink equivalent to KRW 16,000 at the market price from the damaged person and received the food and drink from the damaged person until April 28, 2016, the Defendant acquired the property totaling to KRW 932,000 on a total of 22 occasions, such as the list of crimes, from April 28, 2016.

On March 20, 2016, the Defendant, “2016 Highest 584, the Defendant, at around 22:37, the main point of the Victim G management in Samsung Heavy Industries Co., Ltd., and the fact is not the president of Samsung Heavy Industries Co., Ltd., and there is no intention or ability to pay the drinking value because there is no particular property or certain income. However, the I indictment, an employee, is “victim I,” but I is an employee, and accordingly, the victim is the operator of the main point.