(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.17 2017나22635

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.17 2017나22635

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The defendant's appeal and the plaintiffs' incidental appeal are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant and the incidental costs of appeal.

Reasons

1. Although the appellate court cited the judgment of the court of first instance closely examined the allegations and the evidence submitted by the parties concerned, it does not seem that it erred by the finding of facts and judgment of the court of first instance.

Therefore, the reason for the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in cases where part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Therefore, it is accepted by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

The head of the competent police station shall take the 16th 16th 1 of the judgment of the first instance, "the head of the competent police station", "the head of the competent police station".

Pursuant to 10th 20th 20th 20th 10th 10th 10th 20th 20th 20th 10th 10th 1,000 of the first 10th 1,00th 1,00th 10th 1,00th 10th 2th 10

The 11th of the 12th of the judgment of the first instance court shall be subject to the 11th of the 12th of the 11th of the judgment.

The following shall be deleted. The Act on the Performance of Duties by Police Officers shall be followed by the Act on the Performance of Duties by Police Officers of the first instance. The Act on the Performance of Duties by Police Officers of the first instance shall be amended by the Act on the Performance of Duties by Police Officers of the second instance. The Act on the Performance of Duties by Police Officers of the first instance shall be amended by the Act on the Performance of Duties by Police Officers of the first instance. The Act on the Performance of Duties by Police Officers of the first instance shall be amended by the Act

2. The conclusion of the first instance judgment is justifiable, and all the defendant's appeal and the plaintiffs' incidental appeal are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

참조조문

-경찰관 직무집행법

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.12 2017나53134

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.12.02 2015나52656

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.10.27 2017나20974

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.10.27 2017나3177

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.04.21 2016나68115