logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2013.05.31 2012고합592
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person in charge of overall management of burial as the president of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and the second Do beauty shop, and the victim E (V, 17 years of age) is a person who works as an intern in the above beauty shop from September 18, 2012.

On October 6, 2012, at around 14:30 on October 6, 2012, the Defendant entered the victim into a male toilet outside the beauty room for both men and women, leaving the door, putting a hand on the shoulder of the victim, taking the face of the defendant against the victim, putting the victim's face one time in one side of the victim's left side, and putting the victim's face on one side of the victim's face at one time, and putting the victim's head "I am you see."

Accordingly, the Defendant committed indecent act against the juvenile victim by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The written statement of the defendant;

1. Part of the investigation report (on-site verification)

1. E’s statement in the statement recorded CDs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Article 7 (5) and (3) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse and Article 298 of the Criminal Act, which select the relevant criminal facts and punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 13 (1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Where a conviction becomes final and conclusive on the facts constituting a crime indicated in the judgment on the registration of personal information, which is exempted from the disclosure order and notification order, as prescribed by the proviso to Article 38(1) and the proviso to Article 38-2(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (the defendant is a person subject to registration of personal information as prescribed by Article 33(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, and the defendant is obligated to submit personal

Judgment on Defendant’s argument

1. The Defendant alleged that the Defendant had the head of the toilet drainage room.

arrow