logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.03.31 2015가단49809
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 30,323,830 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from October 17, 2014 to March 31, 2017.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On September 11, 2014, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as the early stage of a white field, while the internal pressure was normal, and the eyesight was also good.

Accordingly, on October 16, 2014, the Plaintiff received an operation to set aside a white boom in the unit from a member of the DNA department operated by the Defendant.

B. On October 17, 2014, the Plaintiff re-exploited the Defendant’s hospital. At this time, the Defendant solicited the Plaintiff to perform the surgery by soliciting the surgery in a lebane. During the surgery, the Defendant was at issue to the Plaintiff, and the Defendant was in the general car driven by the hospital-related party, and moved the Plaintiff to the Eanan Hospital and the hospital.

(c) Proceedings of the Eanyan Hospital refers to the military register in which the correction body of the Plaintiff Postal services deviates, and the booming net boom is widely boomed away from the inner wall.

As soon as it is urgent and urgent, in the case of a water-related alcoholic beverage, a bande bande bande of a bande of a bande of a bande material from the outside of the inside where a heat hole is located, shall carry out freezing in the vicinity of the heat hole after cutting off the bande of a bande of a bande of a bande in the inside.

When it is not possible to refix a net due to a fluoring fluoring fluor, it is an operation to remove glasss by making small holes in the safe-gu and refluoring the net in its original state;

In order to make the burgical burgical durgical durgical durgical durgical durgical durgical durgical durgical durgical durgical d

D.

From October 17, 2014 to November 3, 2014, and from November 14, 2014 to November 24, 2014, the Plaintiff hospitalized in Eanche Hospital on two occasions, and on October 31, 2014, the Plaintiff sold an artificial insemination plant in cases where the Plaintiff was unable to enter an artificial insemination plant on October 31, 2014.

(2).

arrow