1. The plaintiff's appeal and the extended and added claims by this court are all dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

1. In the first instance court, the Plaintiff seems to have filed an application for change of the purport and cause of the claim of the Plaintiff on May 24, 2017, and “916,360,136 won” as stated in the part of the first instance judgment and “916,360,136 won” as stated in the application for change of the purpose and cause of the claim of the Plaintiff on May 24, 2017 and “916,360,136 won” as stated in the part of the claim of the first instance judgment, in light of the description of the above application for change, etc., the Plaintiff seems to have written error of “914,360,136 won” in relation to the passive damage related to the distribution network agreement, 79,970,639 won, 2.797,512,647 won, and 3.

claim for payment jointly and severally.

The first instance court rendered a judgment dismissing the remainder of the claim against the above Defendants and the claim against Defendant D, respectively.

On the other hand, the Plaintiff filed an appeal against the part of the part against which the Plaintiff lost, and the court added the following: (i) expansion of KRW 13,631,935, ② reduction of KRW 503,132,637, and KRW 50,000,00 in relation to the distribution network contract of the instant case through the written brief dated April 3, 2019 and the written application for revision to the purport of the appeal on April 4, 2019; and (ii) further addition of the claim to KRW 503,132,637, and KRW 50,000,00 in the claim for consolation money; and (iii) in relation to the arrangement

Meanwhile, the Defendants did not appeal against the judgment of the first instance.

Therefore, the scope of this court's adjudication is limited to ① the part against each plaintiff among the claims, ② the part against each plaintiff among the claims, and the part of the claim for consolation money which is expanded in relation to the distribution network contract of this case, ③ the part of the claim is transferred to this court, but it is not subject to adjudication.

2. The Court shall have jurisdiction over this part of the basic facts.