The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is as follows: (a) with the victim B (20) and C (21) as an employee from the previous main point of view, the Defendant came to know that he had worked as an employee.

At around 01:10 on May 31, 2014, the Defendant: (a) went to the E main place located in Jinju-si; (b) discovered that the victim C was working as an employee at that place; (c) did not pay the money that he borrowed while performing the work to move out of the main stairs; and (d) assaulted the victim C at least 15 times on the ground that the contact does not occur; and (c) assaulted the victim B, who was in the next place, also to the victim B, on the ground that he spreads bad answers against him.

2. We examine the judgment. The case is a crime falling under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, it is recognized that a written agreement was submitted on July 8, 2014 that the victims would withdraw their wish to punish the defendant, and thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed under Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.