1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 4,000,000 won;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine for forty days.

Punishment of the crime

At around 06:15 on October 7, 2018, the Defendant: (a) called the Defendant’s house located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si; (b) received domestic violence reports and heard the Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s spouse’s statement; and (c) the police officer affiliated with the Suwon-nam Police Station C police box affiliated with the Defendant’s father, who took care of the Defendant’s father; and (d) expressed the Defendant’s desire to “Creinfins, fins, fins, and fins, fins, I will go against the Defendant’s father; and (c) sold the said D’s entry part once in drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 report processing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 100,000 won per day) [the scope of applicable sentences] 10,000 won or less [the decision of sentence] [the act of obstructing the performance of official duties by assaulting a police officer in the performance of official duties] fall the police officer's self-esteem and desire to work in charge of crime prevention and maintenance of social order. If such act is repeated or neglected, it is highly likely to adversely affect the safety of our society as a whole, and damage therefrom will be transferred to all members of our society.

However, in light of the fact that the defendant did not have any history of punishment exceeding the same criminal history or fine, and the defendant seems to have made an effort to punish the victimized police officer in the future, and that in the future, the defendant's age, occupation, environment, economic circumstances, the circumstances of the crime of this case, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., considered the sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, and determined the punishment as ordered by the order.