logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.08.25 2016고정1333
변조사문서행사
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. While the Defendant was unable to receive money from C, the Defendant prepared a certificate of borrowing from C to the effect that C borrowed money from the Defendant under the name of D, a company partner of C, and the said certificate of borrowing stated that D was present in the preparation of the said certificate of borrowing.

In the event that the Defendant did not receive money from C at will, without authority, added the phrase “liability guarantor, joint guarantor,” in front of the D name of the said loan certificate, and changed it to “liability guarantor, joint guarantor D, resident number, resident number - the address - the branch of the Gyeonggi-do branch of the party branch,” and changed to a copy of the loan certificate in the name of D, a private document concerning the rights and obligations, without authority, for the purpose of exercising the right to bring a lawsuit against D as a joint guarantor of the said debt.

2. Criminal facts;

A. On August 5, 2013, the Defendant submitted to the Seoul Northern District Court a written response to the delay of the Seoul Northern District Court 2013Kadan22574, Seoul Northern District Court (Seoul Northern District Court 2013Gadan 22574, the confirmation of the absence of an objection and the absence of an obligation), and submitted to the public official in charge of the competent court the modified loan certificate as if it were duly completed, along with the written response to the above subsequent completion appeal.

B. On May 7, 2014, the Defendant submitted to the Seoul Northern District Court a prepared document of “Seoul Northern District Court 2013Na7989 (No. 2013Na799) to verify the absence of an objection and the absence of an obligation,” and submitted the modified loan certificate to the public official in charge of the court, along with the above prepared document, as if it were genuine.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each protocol of suspect interrogation of the police against the accused (including respective statements made byC and D);

1. Statement made by the prosecution against C;

1. Each written judgment, each borrowed document, and written appraisal;

arrow