A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 4, 2013, around 02:40, the Defendant: (a) expressed that the Defendant: (b) on the ground that, in front of the building B of the Sinsan City, C, his spouse, filed a 112 report while the Defendant was her spouse’s fighting and searched the Defendant’s residence, the Defendant: (c) expressed the said police officer’s desire to open and cross the rear seat of 51 of the patrol 51 on the ground that the said police officer: (d) the Defendant: (e) sent a 112 report while the Defendant was working for the married fighting; (e) and (e) sent the police box belonging to the Seodong Police Station; and (e) the Defendant: (e) sent the Defendant a son, her spouse; (e) sent a bit of bitch; (e) the police officer; and (e) the Defendant expressed that he was the victim, and (e) sent the victim’s face part of the victim’

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers related to the 112 Report Handling, and at the same time, the Defendant placed multiple scambling scamblings, etc. requiring medical treatment for the victim

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. 112 Reporting case management table;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Articles 136(1) and 257(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Although there are criminal records of the same kind, such as fines, etc. to the defendant for the reasons of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act, obstruction of performance of official duties is the first time, the degree of injury to the defendant is in the second place, and the defendant recognizes and repents the criminal facts, the defendant shall be given an opportunity to return to society. However, considering the fact that the crime of this case is an violent act accompanied by the injury to the police officer, the period of suspension of execution shall be set and community service shall be concurrently imposed

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.