logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.01.29 2014가합8683
채무부존재확인
Text

1. Insurance money to be paid by the Plaintiff to the Defendant regarding an injury that occurred to the Defendant on November 7, 2008.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On October 13, 2005, the Plaintiff was established for the purpose of insurance business, etc., and entered into a consortiums integrated accident insurance contract with the Defendant as the insured on October 13, 2005. The main contents of the contract are as shown in the attached Form.

(hereinafter “instant insurance contract”). B.

On November 8, 2008, the Defendant was diagnosed as the left-hand ruptures, cuptures, back-to-date artificial insemination suppressions, etc. from the National Assembly Hospital from November 10, 2008 to the 29th day of the same month, and was hospitalized in the former National University Hospital, and received a total of three network operations, such as ruptures, free-to-land colon’s inletine, and ruptures, in total, such as injecting ruptures, free-VGF injection, and injecting ruptures.

C. After that, the Defendant received an internal pressure treatment around December 2008 due to an increase in the internal pressure, and received an internal pressure treatment on September 23, 2009, and again received an injecting into the instant unit’s actual container on October 19, 2009, due to the recurrence of net gambling symptoms, and again received an injecting into the instant unit’s actual container on October 19, 2009. The Defendant received an injecting into the instant unit’s strod and glass VGF due to the outbreak of melting into the new bloodline in the instant unit on March 12, 2010.

Since October 2009, the defendant showed the safe movement of shores. Since March 2010, 2010, the opportunistic state (a state in which opportunites can be added) came into light. Since October 2010, the opportunistic state (a state in which opportunites cannot be added) came into light.

E. On September 25, 2014, the Defendant received a diagnosis of the remaining disability, which was found impossible to perceive by mixing and injecting a serious marcing container with a strong marculation, with the opical marcability of the opportune at the Jeonbuk University Hospital.

F. On November 7, 2008, the Defendant filed a claim with the Plaintiff for insurance proceeds under the insurance contract of this case on September 29, 2014, alleging that the injury caused by artificial insemination was caused by an artificial insemination in the wind, and that the said injury was caused thereby.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1-1.

arrow