Defendant

D The defendant CE shall be punished by a fine not exceeding 1.5 million won, and the defendant CF shall be punished by a fine not exceeding 500,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

D On December 30, 2010, the Busan District Court sentenced 6 months to a violation of the Illegal Check Control Act at the Busan District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on June 28, 2011.

1. Defendant D’s alteration of public document of Defendant D and CG, upon receiving a copy of business license certificate from Defendant D’s license certificate from Defendant D on August 14, 2012, at the front of the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Busan, Seo-gu, CH, which was operated by Defendant D, for the following reasons: (a) in order to prepare against customers who want not to pay the drinking value on the ground that the entertainment reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception; (b) Defendant D knew and asked CG to request CG to take the form of business license certificate of the above danran bar from the entertainment reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception, and (c) Defendant CG’s consent was made by using Defendant D’s 1’s “the first type of Ga 2’s entertainment reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception.”

Accordingly, the defendant modified one copy of the business permission certificate under the name of the head of the Gu in Busan Metropolitan City, which is an official document, for the purpose of uttering in collusion with CG.

2. On July 17, 2013, Defendant D’s altered official document uttering presented and presented a copy of the modified business permission certificate as if it was duly formed by the police officer who was requested to produce business permission from the police officer who was dispatched after receiving a report from the above CI dan and the entertainment reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception,

3. Any person who violates the Food Sanitation Act by Defendant CE is a customer at a danran bar for profit.