logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.08.12 2015나38570
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the following amount shall be ordered to be paid to the defendant Korean Licensed Real Estate Agent Association:

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendants B and Defendant Intervenor D (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) related to the parties are licensed real estate agents operating a licensed real estate agent’s office in Mapo-gu Seoul, and Defendant Korea Licensed Real Estate Agent Association (hereinafter “Defendant Association”) is the mutual aid business operators of Defendant B and Intervenor.

B. 1) The E Regional Housing Association (hereinafter “instant association”)

F) On August 18, 2009, creative L&C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant company”)’s president F is the head of the partnership.

(2) On October 17, 2011, the Plaintiff entered into a lease contract with respect to the instant association head service business, and the terms and conditions of the contract include: (a) the Plaintiff delegated all the rights, such as the issuance of a seal imprint, the delegation of the issuance of a seal imprint, and the seal imprint; and (b) the Plaintiff delegated all the rights, as the president of the instant association, to the instant company. (c) On October 17, 201, the Plaintiff entered into a lease contract (hereinafter “instant lease contract”) with respect to KRW 202 (hereinafter “instant housing”) out of the Mapo-gu Seoul (hereinafter “instant housing”), a joint intermediary owned by Defendant B and Intervenor, for a period of KRW 70 million from October 31, 2011 to October 31, 2013.

3) The instant lease agreement states that the instant association entered into a contract with the head of the association and that Defendant C, an employee of the instant company, entered into a contract with the head of the lessor as a lessor’s agent. On the other hand, the proxy and the head of the association attached a letter of delegation for “401 out of I,” rather than the power of delegation for the instant house (Evidence 2). Meanwhile, the instant company formed a letter of guarantee to guarantee the return of the lease deposit to the Plaintiff at the time of the conclusion of the instant lease agreement.

C. Commencement of auction procedure for the instant house

arrow