logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원공주지원 2015.02.26 2014가단20942
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The Defendant indicated on the attached sheet No. 79, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 87, and 86. The Defendant indicated on the attached sheet No. 79, 138, 139, 140, 142, and 86.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On May 6, 1950, the network E purchased 614 square meters of the G land from F, the Defendant’s endless hand, before the division, at the time of public land partitioning (hereinafter “the instant trade”).

(b) A part of the G land was divided into part of the G land before the partition and became a 202,909 square meters of D forest land in the Si of official residence prior to the partition, and 202,909 square meters of D forest land in the Si of official residence prior to the partition shall be 209 square meters of D

5. The forests and fields listed in the text of paragraph (1) of this case (hereinafter “the forests and fields of this case”) were divided into the forests and fields stated in the purport of the claim.

C. On May 11, 1950, the net E paid the purchase and sale remaining amount to F, from that time, and began to possess the part of 1,755 square meters “4” as indicated in paragraph (1) of this Article (hereinafter “the part in possession of this case”) while using farmland or a building as a site for three buildings.

On September 10, 1961, the Plaintiff married with the deceased E, and after the deceased on May 30, 2005, the Plaintiff succeeded to the possession of the deceased E as to the part of the possession of this case and has possessed it up to the present day.

[Based on Recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 6 (including each number), Eul evidence 1 through 3, witness H's testimony, the result of the on-site inspection by this court, the result of the appraisal commission to the Director of the Korea Cadastral Corporation's Public Corporation, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. According to the above facts of recognition as to whether the Plaintiff occupied for 20 years, it is recognized that the Plaintiff succeeded to the possession of the network E and has occupied the part of the instant possession from May 11, 1950 to that of the present time.

Furthermore, in full view of the following: (a) whether a net E or the Plaintiff has continuously occupied the part of “bbb” in the claim in a ship for at least 272 square meters for at least 20 years; (b) the entry of No. 4 No. 10; and (c) the purport of the entire pleadings as a result of the on-site inspection conducted by this court, the Plaintiff

However, we examine whether the plaintiff or the deceased E has occupied the above land since 20 years ago, and there is no evidence to acknowledge this.

arrow