1. The Defendants jointly and severally pay to the Plaintiff KRW 96,005,889 as well as KRW 89,00,000,000, respectively, from May 1, 2013.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the purport of evidence No. 1 of the oral argument, the Plaintiff loaned KRW 100 million to Defendant A on September 26, 2012 at the interest rate of KRW 36% per annum, and on January 26, 2013 (hereinafter “instant loan”). The Plaintiff and the Defendants agreed that the repayment method of loans and the payment of interest shall be appropriated in the order of the principal, expenses, interest, and principal, and the Defendant Company B (hereinafter “Defendant B”), and C agreed that the instant loan obligations amount to KRW 130 million per guarantee limit; the Plaintiff deducted the prior interest and remitted KRW 89 million to the Defendant; the Plaintiff and the Defendant were 24% per annum from March 26, 2013 to KRW 360,000; and there was no dispute between the Plaintiff and the Defendant and the Plaintiff on March 26, 2013 to KRW 360,300,000 per annum on the date of repayment; and the Defendants decided on March 136, 2015, 2012013.

If the amount repaid by the Defendants is appropriated in the order of interest and principal, it shall be as stated in the attached Form “the calculation of interest on loans and the total sum of principal and interest.”

Therefore, according to the above facts of recognition, the Defendants jointly and severally pay to the Plaintiff the interest and delay damages at the rate of 24% per annum from May 1, 2013 to the date of full payment, which is the date following the last repayment date of the Defendants, as to the principal and interest of the instant loan obligation, KRW 96,005,889, and the principal and interest of KRW 89,000,000,000, which are calculated by deducting the interest from the advance interest, to the date of full payment. Defendant B and C are liable to pay within the extent not exceeding KRW

2. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant A is justified, and each claim against the defendant B and C is accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claim is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.