beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
Reasons
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as follows, and the reasoning for the court’s determination of this case is identical to the ground for the judgment of the court of first instance except for adding the following contents. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the
2. The following shall be added to the portion to which the Court of First Instance 5 (5) and 21 (21) of the decision:
The following is added to the judgment of the court of first instance 7th of the judgment of the court of first instance, "It is reasonable for the defendant to consider the plaintiff as a party to the exchange contract of this case, not the F as a party to the exchange contract of this case, because the plaintiff directly contacted J at the time of the exchange contract of this case or did not pay the down payment to the plaintiff as a party to the contract of this case with respect to the Gyeonggi-gun H land exchanged with the real estate of this case at the time of the exchange contract of this case. 7) The plaintiff's wife was registered as a shareholder only for 3,400 shares of the defendant company's company as a party to the exchange contract of this case, and for the remaining 6,600 shares close to that two times, F and G are registered as a shareholder."
Furthermore, after the instant exchange contract was entered into on October 2014, M&D (hereinafter “instant hotel”) with respect to the criminal investigation procedure against J, etc. involving M&D (hereinafter “instant hotel”). The issue at the time there was no water spilling out at all, and the matter at the time of the underground was caused by a string, not by water leakage. There was no problem that water flow out or water flows out. There was no problem that water flow out or water flows out. In light of the fact that water leakage problem was not carried out, it was not carried out, and in light of the I, N and the Plaintiff’s personal relationship, etc., the instant hotel is an inadequate construction work.