1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff’s arguments Nos. 1 and 2 were owned by the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s father Nonparty Party E. The Defendant: (a) hospitalized in a patient room with heavy illness and obtained a certificate of personal seal impression by stealing another seal imprint; (b) forged the gift document and mortgage contract; and (c) completed the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the Defendant as to the first real estate; and (d) the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the Defendant as to the second real estate under the name of the Defendant.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to implement the procedure for cancellation registration of each of the above registrations, which is invalid for the plaintiff.

2. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in the statement No. 1 (including the branch number), the Plaintiff may recognize the fact that the Plaintiff renounced the inheritance of the E’s property through the procedure of Seosan Branch of Daejeon District Court No. 2013-Ma139.

Therefore, the Plaintiff is not in the position of the owner of the first and second real estate seeking the exclusion of disturbance against the Defendant, and thus cannot seek cancellation of each registration against the Defendant. Even if the Plaintiff did not waive inheritance, there is no evidence to deem that each registration in the name of the Defendant was forged.

3. According to the conclusion, the plaintiff's claim cannot be accepted, and it is so decided as per Disposition.