1. The Defendant’s KRW 16,00,000 for the Plaintiff and the following: 5% per annum from October 17, 2014 to January 12, 2017.

1. Basic facts

A. On January 19, 2014, the Defendant filed a lawsuit claiming ownership transfer registration from B (Seoul Central District Court 2013Gahap25748), and filed a lawsuit with the above court on January 19, 2014, “1. The Defendant: (a) performed to B the procedure for ownership transfer registration on the ground of an agreement made on June 29, 2012 with respect to one-half of the 314§³ in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul; and (b) performed the procedure for change of the name of the owner who changed the Defendant to B in the name of the owner of the building indicated in the separate sheet; (c) the Defendant filed an appeal against B on September 1, 2012 to January 9, 2014; and (d) paid to B the amount calculated at the rate of 20% per annum per annum from the next day to the day on which the full payment is complete.”

B. On February 19, 2014, the Defendant concluded a contract on the delegation of a lawsuit (hereinafter “instant delegation contract”) with the Plaintiff engaging in legal affairs, with respect to the performance of the said appellate case (hereinafter “instant appellate case”), and agreed to pay the retainer fee in an amount equivalent to 20% of the sum of the dismissal amount of the claim for the interest in arrears cited in the original instance and the amount received by the Defendant (including the case where the lawsuit is terminated by the ruling such as mediation, recommendation for reconciliation, etc.).

C. Pursuant to the instant delegation agreement, D attorneys-at-law, who belong to the Plaintiff, appeared on March 31, 2014 (written grounds for appeal), present and present arguments on May 16, 2014, the submission of the preparatory documents on June 18, 2014, and the submission of the preparatory documents on June 20, 2014. On June 20, 2014, the Plaintiff appeared at the second conciliation date in accordance with the decision on the resumption of pleadings and the return of conciliation, and presented conciliation opinions on the conciliation date, but the conciliation was failed, the full bench rendered a decision on recommending reconciliation (hereinafter “decision on recommending reconciliation of this case”).

In this case.