Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

around 18:30 on October 22, 2017, the Defendant returned to the Defendant E (69 tax) who was the head of the household, who was the head of the household who was living together in the wall C at the port of the Busan Shipping D (63 tons) of the fleet D (63 tons) of the Busan Shipping D (63 tons).

As stated above, the victim is asked as “A” and the victim is called “A” upon the captain;

Whether or not the mate interferes with the entry of an institution head.

In other words, “I am this bath,” and “I ambath, I am ambath, and ambath, ambath.”

“Along with a sound drinking, the victim’s left eye was geled once, the victim’s head was kneeked once, and the victim’s face was humfed by his left hand, and the victim was humfed, and the victim’s face was humfed by his hand, and the victim was humfed for about three weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. The circumstantial report and each internal investigation report (the confirmation of a ship in the field of violence D and the confirmation of weather styp images);

1. A medical certificate of injury (E);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of Chapter 5 to Chapter 8 of a photograph of evidence, Chapter 18 of a photograph verifying the scene of injury on the line, Chapter 5 of a photograph verifying the scene of injury on the line, and Chapter 5 of a photograph capturing a photograph capturing the cstyf image concerning D

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant has been subject to 26 criminal punishment, and among which, the records of punishment for the same kind of crime have reached 14 times.

In particular, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for the crime of injury on June 12, 2015, and committed the instant crime without being aware of the period of repeated crime after the execution of the sentence was completed on December 9, 2015. As such, there is a high possibility of criticism for the instant crime.

Considering the criminal history of the defendant.