logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원마산지원 2016.08.24 2015가합100679
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company established for the purpose of civil engineering and construction work business.

Defendant D is the head of the Plaintiff’s Fund Management Department from December 10, 200 to June 24, 2008; Defendant E is the person who works as the Plaintiff’s Fund Management Department from January 6, 2003 to June 24, 2008; Defendant F works as the Plaintiff’s Accounting Director from November 6, 2006 to June 24, 2008; and Defendant B works as the Plaintiff’s Accounting Director from November 6, 2006 to June 24, 2008; Defendant B works as the Plaintiff’s Hnew apartment sales; and Defendant G works as the Plaintiff’s managing director, while serving as the Plaintiff’s managing director, in charge of the selection and financing of the subcontractor at the I Apartment Complex Construction Site.

On the other hand, Defendant B and Defendant C are those who have traded funds with the Plaintiff and the discount of notes.

on August 30, 2006 J. 200, 2000, 2000, 3000, 0000 on August 13, 2006, 200, 300, 000, 000 on November 30, 2006, 300, 000, 60. 06. 7. 06. 30, 00, 000, 000 on November 30, 2006, 200. 7. 10, 200, 200, 00, 000, 7. 30. 10, 200, 00, 000 on April 20, 2007, 200, 300, 300;

B. Defendant C or J received money equivalent to its face value by presenting eight copies of promissory notes issued by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant notes”) as follows.

C. Meanwhile, five times from March 22, 2007 to August 9, 2007, the Plaintiff’s bank account was deposited in total of KRW 1.61 billion from Defendant B’s bank account to Defendant B’s bank account, and KRW 99 million from April 13, 2007 to Defendant C’s bank account respectively.

(hereinafter referred to as “the amount of each of the above inputs”). 【The grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, each of the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including virtual numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The Defendants asserting the Plaintiff’s assertion are competing with each other.

arrow