1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

1. The reasons for this part of this Court’s summary are as follows: (a) the reasons for this decision are as stated in Chapters 6 through 4 in the judgment of the first instance, except in the following cases; and (b) therefore, they are cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In the first instance judgment, the following is added between the first instance judgment Nos. 4 and the second instance judgment, and the third instance judgment is replaced by the fact that there is no dispute (based on recognition), Gap Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 15 (including paper numbers), Eul evidence Nos. 2 and 8, and the purport of all pleadings.

D. Defendant E, who is in charge of the conclusion of the instant contract between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff (the Defendant used the position of director-general of the New Media Team affiliated with the Defendant)

From December 16, 2013 to January 11, 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) received a transfer of KRW 14,300,000 from Macro Co., Ltd; (b) KRW 67,00,000 from Yan C&P; and (c) KRW 175,70,000,000 in total from 30,000 from 175,70,000 from 175,70,000 from 30,000; (c) was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for gambling and personal debt repayment (or one year of 2016,00,000,000 from 16,000). In relation to the instant investment funds, the Plaintiff filed a complaint against E, etc. on the charge of fraud; (d) in the case where the Plaintiff did not file a complaint with the prosecutor’s office on December 11, 2015 for the first reason for the increase of the instant business losses.

(i) the Act;

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. In full view of the facts seen earlier, the instant contract is a joint agreement under Article 703 of the Civil Act, which provides that “the Plaintiff bears the cost of manufacturing and distributing the NFC-t tags, the Defendant manufactures and distributes the NFC-t tags system to the entire store, and supplies, maintains, and manages the NFC-t tags system, and distributes profits generated from advertising orders using the above NFC-t tags,” and is a type of contract agreement (a type of contract) stipulated by Article 703 of the Civil Act.