logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2016.10.19 2016고정67
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant in the instant charges is a person engaged in driving a C-A-to-purd passenger vehicle.

On November 28, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 07:20, and proceeded bypassing the front side of the head office of the North-gu Posi Port, North-gu, the 40 kilometers at a restricted speed of 40 kilometers, in accordance with four lanes from the speed bus terminal.

Since a signal, etc. is installed, and traffic control is performed, in such a case, the driver of the motor vehicle has the duty of care to prevent the accident in advance by safely driving the motor vehicle in accordance with the traffic signals by reducing the speed and keeping it well.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and found the Defendant’s negligence bypassing it as it is in contravention of the signal, and from the port side of the port side of the maim-gu to the direction of the port side of the road crossing, that the victim D gets on the bicycle in the crosswalk by pedestrian on-and-off signals, and did not avoid it, and received the damaged bicycle on the front part of the Defendant’s bicycle side.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury, such as the slock and salt of the slocks requiring medical treatment for about 18 days, due to the above occupational negligence.

2. Determination:

A. According to the record of recognition, the location of the instant accident is four-lanes of the road in which the Defendant was installed immediately before the front direction of the road in the front direction, and there is a stop line immediately preceding the road in the front direction, and there was a vehicle signal apparatus on the side side of the road in the intersection, and the crosswalk did not have a separate vehicle aid, etc. on the road. The Defendant proceeded with the vehicle along the fourth line, the right line before the right line. In the process, the Defendant tried to proceed along the vehicle without stopping on the right line immediately preceding the crosswalk, and then going on the right line from the left side of the Defendant’s running direction.

arrow