logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.05.29 2012고정5270
자동차관리법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 16, 2012, the Defendant operated the foregoing vehicle with light devices installed at will, without obtaining approval from the head of the competent Gu, in order to change the structure or device of the vehicle from the Kandong Hospital to the Busan Gandong-dong Busan Metropolitan Medical Center in order to change the structure or device of the vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D (former E) and F;

1. Application of statutes on motor vehicle registration certificates;

1. Article applicable to facts constituting an offense, and Articles 81 subparagraph 20 and 34 of the Automobile Management Act that choose the penalty;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. The defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion on the claim of the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act that bear the cost of lawsuit does not constitute a change in the structure of the motor vehicle subject to approval by the head of the competent Gu, but the defendant was not aware of the fact that structural change was

The installation of light devices constitutes other light devices under Article 8 (1) 14 of the Enforcement Decree of the Automobile Management Act, which falls under the alteration of the structure of a motor vehicle subject to approval pursuant to Article 5 (1) 2 of the Enforcement Rule of the same Act, and the witness F was present at this court and notified the defendant that the light devices of the motor vehicle of this case are illegal without the approval of the head of the competent Gu, and did not inform the snow.

Even if the defendant gives testimony to the purport that he was aware of it, each of the above arguments between the defendant and his defense counsel is without merit, and the costs of the lawsuit are also borne by the defendant.

arrow