Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. From April 17, 2015 to 13:10 on April 17, 2015, the Defendants: (a) took advantage of the gap between G Animal Hospital located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E’s diagnosis and treatment; and (b) Defendant A took advantage of the gap between the victim’s diagnosis and care; (c) Defendant A took advantage of the gap between the victim’s diagnosis and care; (d) one betachuseure 1; and (e) one betuse C.E.T value of at least 15,000 won at the market price; (d) one betuse of at least KRW 9,000 at the market price; and (e) one betuse 1; (e) a 40,000 won at the market price; (e) a 30,000 won at the market price; and (e) Defendant A’s 160,000 won at the market price; and (e) a 36060,000 SNN of goods at the market price.

Accordingly, the Defendants committed a theft of goods owned by the victim.

2. 피해자 H에 대한 특수절도 피고인들은 위 1.항 기재 일시경 위 F 안에 있는 I 펫샵에서 피해자의 감시가 소홀한 틈을 이용하여, 피고인 A은 시가 15,000원 상당의포우즈라텍스신발 1켤레, 시가 25,000원 상당의 러스 슬리브리스 1벌, 시가 9,900원 상당의 유기농 고구마 3개 등 시가 합계 69,700원 상당의 물품 3개를 카트에 싣고 나와 CCTV 사각지대로 이동한 다음 피고인 A의 가방 안에 위 물품을 집어 넣고, 피고인 B은 위와 같이 A이 물건을 훔치는 동안 망을 보는 방법으로 시가 69,700원 상당의 물품 3개를 절취하였다.

As a result, the defendants stolen goods owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each statement of D and H;

1. Receipt for withholding transactions;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (in the event of a crime, specified);

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;