A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 27, 2014, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), and a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for the same crime in the Seosan Branch of the Daejeon District Court on April 17, 2008.

On April 6, 2016, around 21:39, the Defendant driven CK5 car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.061% while under the influence of alcohol without obtaining a driver’s license from around 500 meters from the front day of the ethic galter of the ethic ethic ethic rithic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic eth

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions: Inquiry about criminal history and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of investigation report (verification of criminal history of the suspect's same kind of crime);

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1, Article 44 (1), subparagraph 1 of Article 152, and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. In light of the criminal records of the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act (no record exceeding imprisonment without prison labor), drinking values, drinking driving circumstances, etc. of the defendant, the defendant has a risk of de facto employment, although he/she has no record of the same crime;

Even if it is necessary to make a sentence such as the order to prevent recidivism.