The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the prosecutor’s gist of the grounds of appeal (e.g., the damage inflicted on the victimized woman due to the instant special injury crime committed by the Defendant, which was committed by the Defendant, and the fact that the means of access transferred by the Defendant was used to commit the Bosing fraud, thereby calculating additional damage, and that the Defendant had the record of criminal punishment due to the same kind of crime, the lower court’s sentence that sentenced one year and four months to imprisonment is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the facts alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court’s punishment is too unjustifiable and unreasonable, considering the following factors: (a) the Defendant recognized the mistake of the Defendant; (b) the history of criminal punishment for the same kind of crime, but there is no history of punishment; and (c) the motive and background of each of the instant crimes; (d) the circumstances before and after the instant crime; and (e) the character, conduct, environment, and family relationship of the Defendant as indicated in the instant records and arguments, etc., the aforementioned assertion is without merit.

3. The prosecutor's appeal of conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.