logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.06.11 2013고단2887
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On October 6, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months at the Busan District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and the probation period is currently under suspension of execution, which became final and conclusive on October 6, 2012.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On May 01, 201, at around 06:45, the Defendant driven a Crops car without obtaining a driver’s license in a section of about 12 km from the front of the road located in the name line of Busan Dong-dong, 1, 506-153, Dong-dong, Busan, to the front of the maintenance of the road.

2. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate any motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

The Defendant driven a CAP car owned by the Defendant, which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in the foregoing paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Details of cancellation and disposition of driver's license, ledger of driver's license, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing mandatory insurance;

1. Relevant Article 152 subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act, Article 43 of the same Act, Article 46 (2) 2 and Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, and selection of fines concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act are that the defendant repents his mistake and reflects his depth, the defendant is responsible for his family's livelihood, and the punishment like the order is imposed in consideration of various sentencing conditions shown in this case.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.

arrow