logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2021.01.13 2020고단1203
사기방조
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

The applicant's application for compensation.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, upon receiving a proposal from an employee who is responsible for the illegal telephone finance fraud, solicited the victims to commit the crime of false telephone finance fraud with his/her name, such as collecting and delivering cash from the victims.

On September 17, 2020, a member of the telephone finance fraud mediation staff assumes a phone call from the offline on September 17, 2020 and assumes a victim E with "I would have the victim E get a loan if I would pay 1270,000 won of the existing loan received from F.

A false statement was made to the effect that the thesis to be sent to the staff was "I refer to that person."

However, in fact, there was no intention or ability to make a loan, even though he was not an employee of the D Bank, and even if he was paid money from the victim.

At around 15:40 on the same day, the Defendant was working as a staff member of the H 2 station in Pyeongtaek-si G, and issued a certificate of full payment in the name of the representative director of the FF, which was forged, and received 1,2770,000 won as a repayment for a loan from the victim E, and deposited 100,000 won into an account with the exception of 10,000 won in accordance with the direction of the staff member of the FF financial fraud assistance in the above name.

In addition, from around that time to February 25 of the same month, the Defendant received total of KRW 7,832,00 from victims of telephone finance fraud by the same method three times, such as the statement in the list of crimes attached hereto, and remitted the amount of KRW 7,832,00 to the account sent by the said victims of telephone finance fraud.

Accordingly, the defendant could easily prevent the fraudulent act of the victims of non-named telephone finance fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Police statements made to B, E, and C;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Details of the Kakao Stockholm dialogue;

1. As a result of digital evidence analysis, the report legislation shall apply 1.

arrow