logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2018.04.12 2017가합750
임용취소처분취소등
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a school foundation that operates C High Schools (hereinafter “instant schools”) and D Middle Schools.

The Plaintiff passed the appointment examination of a regular teacher in the year 2016 of the instant school (hereinafter “instant appointment examination”), and was employed as a sports teacher in the instant school from March 1, 2016 (hereinafter “instant appointment contract”).

The number of employees (person) working at the recruitment field, the higher 4 sports 1 C and D;

1. The subjects and number of persons engaged in solicitation;

3. Restriction on qualifications for application;

(b) A person disqualified for appointment under other related Acts and subordinate statutes;

4. Issuance and receipt of applications for taking examinations;

(b) Period of receipt: From November 18, 2015 09:30 to November 25, 2011 (water) 15:00

8. General principles of examination date;

(d) In the case of being subject to a disposition by unlawful means, the suspension or invalidation of a party’s examination, and may not take the next competitive examination for selecting a candidate for appointment of a teacher of the Foundation; 10. Even if a person is determined as a final successful candidate to revoke the final successful candidate, the successful candidate shall be revoked:

(b) Cheaters;

B. On October 20, 2015, the Defendant made a public announcement regarding the instant appointment examination (hereinafter “instant appointment notice”) as follows.

C. On October 2015, E, the father of the Plaintiff, granted KRW 170 million to G, who was the father of the Defendant F and the former president of the Defendant, at the time of the Plaintiff’s death.

G around December 9, 2015, around December 2015, the Defendant’s corporate head, sent a list of 10 persons to be passed, including the Plaintiff, to G. On December 9, 2015, H directed I to deliver and pass the said list to the head of the school affairs of the instant case, who is the general manager of the instant appointment examination.

On December 11, 2015, I delivered the above 10 list to J of the principal of the instant case, who is an interview examiner for the appointment examination of the instant case, and I given the above 10 points to the above 10 persons at the second interview.

arrow