logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.07.17 2019구단20116
유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The plaintiff is the denial of the network B.

On June 19, 2013, the deceased joined C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant workplace”) and worked as the head of the business division, and has been in charge of the management of orders and processes.

Around 13:30 on April 4, 2018, the Deceased complained of her answer from her chest, which was used in the meeting room at around 14:00, and was transferred to the E Hospital via the D University Hospital at the 119 first-lane D University Hospital, and died on July 4, 2018 during treatment (hereinafter “the instant injury”).

B. On July 4, 2018, the Plaintiff asserted that the death of the deceased was an occupational accident and claimed the bereaved family’s benefits and funeral expenses to the Defendant.

C. After deliberation by the Occupational Disease Determination Committee, the Defendant rendered a decision on the payment of survivors’ benefits and funeral site expenses (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation between the death and the business of this case.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap Nos. 1, 2, Eul Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 15 (including numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The legality of the instant disposition

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the deceased had a high blood pressure existing disease had caused a serious burden due to the customer’s demand, etc. due to delay in the payment period during the work process, and that the existing disease rapidly aggravated due to extreme stress symptoms related to work, such as pressure due to the quality of the company related thereto, and caused the death and death of the injury of this case, there is a proximate causal relationship between the deceased’s death and the work.

Nevertheless, the prior defendant's disposition is unlawful on different premise.

(b) as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes.

C. Based on the facts, 1) The Deceased’s Person under the direct control of the Deceased from 1997 to 2013, F Co., Ltd., G Co., Ltd., H and I Co., Ltd. (China).

arrow