logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.06.12 2014고정501
건설산업기본법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

Defendant

A fails to pay the above fine; 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates a corporation B in the old City D, 102, and B is a corporation established for the purpose of construction business and housing industry.

1. On February 27, 2012, Defendant A entered into a contract for the construction of an indication improvement project of the surface of the Suwon Police Station within the jurisdiction of the Suwon Police Station, which consists of KRW 188,4420,00 in the Suwon-si transfer-dong of Suwon-si and the cost of the viewing of water sources and the cost of the viewing of water sources.

No constructor shall subcontract the whole or part of his contracted construction works to another constructor.

Nevertheless, on March 2012, 2012, Defendant A entered into a construction contract with the effect that the above construction work is subcontracted to E in an amount equivalent to KRW 1,30,000,000 at the office of the B Co., Ltd. located in Seocho-si, Seocho-si. and had Defendant E carry out construction work.

2. The above defendant A, a representative director of the above defendant, committed the above violation in relation to the defendant's business at the date, time, and place mentioned in paragraph (1) above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the standard contract for facility construction (B stock company) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

A. Defendant A: Article 96 Subparag. 4 and Article 29(1) of the Framework Act on the Construction Industry; the selection of fines

(b) Defendant B: Article 98(2), Article 96 subparag. 4, and Article 29(1) of the Framework Act on the Construction Industry

1. Defendant A at a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act or more.

arrow