Defendant

A and B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1.5 million, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the internal relationship of F, the mother of the victim E (n, 28 years of age). Defendant B and C are the external relationship of the victim. The victim is dissatisfied with the fact that the F, its mother, maintains internal relations with Defendant A, and the victim did not have good relationship with the Defendants.

Defendant

At around 19:30 on November 15, 2012, A was working at a wing factory operated by F in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G2, Gangnam-gu, 2012. While the victim was found in the above factory, the body of the victim was cut up by drinking and drinking, etc., and the defendant B, who was found in the above factory after the locking, took the body of the victim after walking the victim's head, walking the victim's body and walking the victim's body more than twice, and took the part of the victim's body more than twice, and walked the victim's body more than twice, and walked the victim's body more than twice with the left part, and Defendant C, who was found in the above factory after the locking, continued to walk the victim's head and walk the victim's body to the left part, and walk the victim's body at one-time, and walked the victim's body at one-time, and walked the victim's body.

As a result, the Defendants caused damage to the integrity of other head parts requiring treatment for about three weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. The protocol of each police officer's statement to E and H, and the first police officer's statement to F, some of the statements made;

1. E statements;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of the victim's upper part of the body;

1. Defendants: Articles 263, 257 (1), and 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Defendant B and the defense counsel’s assertion regarding Defendant B and the defense counsel’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; Defendant B and the defense counsel exercised bathing and violence against friendly F.