Defendant

The appeal against the defendant A and the prosecutor B is dismissed.

1. Reasons for appeal;

A. Defendant A (1) misunderstanding of the facts or misapprehension of the legal doctrine) Defendant 1 said that the victim’s saves with a lar-sathn and wirs.

There is only a spabling fact, and there is no spabling fact.

The victim's larlar with the victim's larlar, and the victim's lar.

An act met shall be considered as a legitimate act or defense of a political party.

2) The lower court’s unreasonable sentencing is hot.

B. The lower court’s punishment against the Defendant B of the Prosecutor is somewhat less.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly examined and adopted by Defendant A’s assertion of misunderstanding of facts or misapprehension of the legal doctrine, such as the protocol of interrogation of suspect, etc., as to Defendant A’s grounds for appeal, the Defendant can sufficiently recognize the fact that the Defendant spawns the victim’s breath and spath

Even if considering that the victim was a situation in which the victim was frightening to female customers in dancing and was trying to have a dispute with the co-defendant B, it is difficult to evaluate that the defendant's act constitutes a legitimate act or defense of a political party.

2) There is no significant change in circumstances to consider the sentencing of the Defendant after the judgment of the court below regarding the unfair argument of sentencing.

Taking into account the sentencing conditions shown in the records and changes of the instant case, the lower court’s punishment is heavy even considering all the circumstances asserted by the Defendant on the grounds of appeal.

subsection (b) of this section.

B. There is no significant change in circumstances that consider the sentencing of the defendant after the judgment of the court below regarding the reasons for appeal by the prosecutor.

Taking into account the conditions of sentencing as indicated in the records and changes of the instant case, the lower court’s sentence is light even considering all the circumstances asserted by the prosecutor on the grounds of appeal.

subsection (b) of this section.

3. Conclusion, Defendant A and Prosecutor’s appeal against Defendant B cannot be accepted.