logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2016.09.08 2016고정99
사기
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged of this case is as follows: (a) the Defendant, by intentionally causing a traffic accident with C with a person related to de facto marriage, conspired to obtain insurance proceeds by means of pretending to be injured, such as claiming insurance proceeds to the insurance company, even though he did not receive insurance proceeds or injury due to minor traffic

1. On December 30, 2012, the Defendant conspired with the above C on December 30, 2012, in collusion with the said C, caused a traffic accident by intention with D vehicles at the restaurant parking lot near the off-dong Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and then, as if the Defendant was injured due to a traffic accident, the Defendant received a traffic accident by false statement from the LIG insurance company to the effect that “the Defendant was in contact with the victim who was taking advantage of driving the vehicle, caused the occurrence of the contact with the victim,” and received KRW 763,320 as agreed money and treatment expenses from the victim.

2. On June 5, 2013, in collusion with the above C on June 16, 2013, the Defendant caused a traffic accident by intentionally using the E-vehicle from the Busan Southern-gu, Busan-gu, around 16:30 on June 5, 2013, and the Defendant and C and their children were injured due to the traffic accident, and the Defendant, the victim, Samsung Fire Insurance Co., Ltd., received a traffic accident report with the purport that “the traffic accident caused the confusion between Brck and X-cell while driving the vehicle,” and received KRW 3,223,850 from the victim as agreed money and treatment expenses.”

3. On November 4, 2013, in collusion with the above C on November 4, 2013, the Defendant: (a) caused a traffic accident by intent to use the E vehicle from the adjoining area of Seongdong-gu Seoul (hereinafter referred to as Seongdong-gu Seoul) around November 11, 2013; and (b) accepted a traffic accident with the purport that, as the Defendant and the said C, F, and his/her dependent G were injured due to a traffic accident, the Defendant, the victim of Samsung Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “the victim, who caused a traffic accident that conflicts with the T, F, and his/her dependent on the vehicle, was the victim.

arrow